Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"The problem of an eidos in history, hence, arises only when a Christian transcendental fulfillment becomes immanentized. Such an immanentist hypostasis of the eschaton, however, is a theoretical fallacy."-Eric Voegelin
George Will Advice
"I grew up in Champaign, Illinois, midway between Chicago and St. Louis. At an age too tender for life-shaping decisions, I made one. While all my friends were becoming Cardinals fans, I became a Cub fan. My friends, happily rooting for Stan Musial, Red Schoendienst and other great Redbirds, grew up cheerfully convinced that the world is a benign place, so of course, they became liberals. Rooting for the Cubs in the late 1940s and early 1950s, I became gloomy, pessimistic, morose, dyspeptic and conservative. It helped out of course that the Cubs last won the World Series in 1908, which is two years before Mark Twain and Tolstoy died. But that means, class of 1998, that the Cubs are in the 89th year of their rebuilding effort, and remember, any team can have a bad moment. So fellow members of the Class of 1998, my last piece of advice is - Mamas don't let your babies grow up to be Cub fans."
Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(101)
-
▼
July
(16)
- Grant it to the liberals when they are funny:Is Ba...
- new post at pruzan.blogspot.com
- Rob Long:A few years ago, I lived at thebeach in S...
- from National Review's "The Week":On the other han...
- read horseraceblog
- more here
- now all you need to do is figure out the pattern, ...
- Why Are Jews Funny?
- Edwards, Nunn on Obama's Veep List
- this does have some funny parts.
- Read Jonah Goldberg's Guide to Republican VP Candi...
- Quote of the Day
- weekly standard
- July 10, 2008 Being Barack, Or, We Don't Kno...
- idiocy watch
- Cosby on Wright
-
▼
July
(16)
where a tone of careless informality prevails; posts oscillate between the uselessly brief and the uselessly logorrheic; complexity and complication are eschewed; the humor is cringe-making, with irony present only in its conspicuous absence; arguments are solipsistic; writers traffic more in pronouncement than persuasion; PLUS little more than recounting what have become one side's talking points is accomplished
No comments:
Post a Comment